verdant ritual.
Rebuilding Verdant Ritual's repeat rate from 18% to 51% and cutting paid dependency in half
The Build | The Run | The Handoff
5 months standalone
what was bleeding
Verdant Ritual had a beautiful product, a press hit at launch, and an 18% repeat rate that had been flat for nine months. Paid was carrying 78% of revenue. The founder was running lifecycle out of a Google Sheet and a spare evening.
the build
We didn't add paid. We rebuilt lifecycle first. Twelve Klaviyo flows replaced three. A second-purchase nudge at day 22. A refill prompt tied to product half-life. A win-back at day 90 with a one-question survey instead of a discount.
the run
Repeat rate climbed from 18% to 51% over months four through eleven. Paid's share of revenue fell to 39%. We added a sampling program for first-time buyers — the cost looked terrible in month one and excellent by month six.
Repeat rate climbed from 18% to 51% in nine months
the handoff
Months 12-15 we trained Tara, who'd been promoted from coordinator to Lifecycle Lead. She ran the November launch end to start, including the segmentation tree. We reviewed flows once a week, then once a month, then not at all.
the exit
We're standalone observers now. Verdant added a subscription tier in March we had nothing to do with. They told us about it the day it launched, which was the right amount of warning for an ex-agency.
What Sienna Holloway said
I'd been told by three other agencies that my repeat-rate problem was a product problem. Last Agency looked at the same data and said it was a flow problem. They were right — we went from 18 to 51 percent without changing a single SKU. What still gets me is how they ended it. Tara, who started as my coordinator, was running lifecycle by month thirteen because they'd been quietly teaching her the whole time. They trained her into a job that fired them. I send Aman a Diwali card now. That's the relationship.
the numbers that stopped moving when we left.
- ROAS5.1x lifecycle-attributed revenue per email
- CAC reductionPaid dependency 78% → 39%
- revenue scaleRepeat rate 18% → 51%
- time to in-house15 months
more graduates.
Counterhouse case study Counterhouse5 months standaloneCounterhousefashionReyansh Khurana · MumbaiMishti Co case study mishti &co3 months standalonemishti &cofoodPulling Mishti Co's CAC out of a tailspin: ₹1,240 to ₹460 in nine months
Priya Iyer · ChennaiTilden Learn case study tilden/learn16 months standalonetilden/learnedtechCutting Tilden's lead-to-enroll cost from $94 to $37 across two product lines in eleven…
Marcus Tilden · TorontoOstara Market case study 18 months standalonemarketplaceDoubling Ostara's two-sided GMV in fourteen months while shifting acquisition from paid…
Esme Cavendish · London
same shape engagement. your name in this slot next.
Twelve to eighteen months. Fixed scope. We build the function, run it, train your hire, hand over the playbook. Then we're gone.